The business of sin.
Institutional religions are businesses, businesses that need to create needs in clients or future clients to which they are supposedly going to give you the solution, okay? What’s the first thing they tell you? That you were born a sinner, okay? I’m talking about the Catholic Church, the head of the Catholic Church and the head of the church of the Protestant churches. They all appear to be rivals but in reality they are partners and create needs in their future clients. Obviously they are not going to tell you that they are deceiving you, but they are deceiving you. When they debate among themselves it is pure smokescreen because in the end they defend the same book that the ancestor of the Catholic Church defined in corrupt councils, yes, corrupt councils that have sanctified injustice, lies. Why do I know this? because I’ve been reading your Bible, the Bibles, because it’s practically the same Bible, Protestants or Catholics, they are practically the same Bible, a few books more, a few books less, but in essence they are the same messages approved by the pro-Roman councils, and there are a series of contradictions that I expose on my website which shows manipulation. When I say that the Bible has lies, I’m not saying that God lies, I’m saying that Rome lied, they have programmed people so that people automatically associate the guy who denies the Bible with an atheist, I’m not an atheist, obviously there are atheists who also criticize the Bible but that is not my case because I’m not an atheist. What is sin then? Think about it carefully, is sin an act against God or against the church or the institution that says «this is sin»? Well, the true sin, in my opinion, is an injustice, an injustice, because I think that God exists and that he has the superior virtue, so God is just, that’s how I see it, okay? I define God as someone just, now, these guys put injustices in the same bag with sins that they have invented, I tell you this as an ex-Catholic because I was a follower of Catholicism because that’s how I was raised, okay? So they would tell me, for example: «not going to mass is a sin,» right? What is the injustice? Injustice, not kneeling before an image to give it your honor? Yes, exactly, they say that not going to church on Sunday to avoid kneeling before images and crosses is a sin, but it is not a sin against God obviously, it is a sin against the church, against the institution then, there are several things they make you feel sinful and that you have the need to wash away your sins by attending their organization to repeat their rites, dogmas, sacraments, etc., in which in one way or another they profit, they have so much money that they make donations, but even if they make donations it is ill-gotten money because it is based on lies and they always keep something for themselves, that is why the Vatican has a lot of gold and silver, it has a lot of money, right?But it’s ill-gotten money because it’s money obtained through lies and deception. You can see the whole series of deceptions that I’ve exposed on my website ellameencontrara.com, right? So, there’s mental programming so that people believe that we all need to belong to one of those religions—Protestants, Catholics, right? Everyone has been indoctrinated to believe that they need to belong to that respective religious organization. Why? Because without need, there’s no search for the supposed solution. So, the first thing they tell you is, «We’re all sinners.» That’s what they tell you: «Everyone is born with sin, so everyone needs baptism, everyone needs to belong so that those sins can be washed away.» I mean, from the moment you’re a newborn, they’re already imputing sins to you: «Oh, sinner, you need to be baptized.» You see? And there are parents who believe that and baptize their children and continue the cycle of mental defilement, because it’s not brainwashing, it’s defilement. Does it seem fair to you, for example, that a person who loves justice and truth takes the blame on an institution and says, «Through my great fault, I sinned through my great fault»? Does it seem fair to you that he says it along with the priest who is a… let’s suppose, it’s the case of a priest who was found guilty of raping children? Because you’ve seen in the news that have come to light, cases of sexual abuse of minors committed not only by Catholic priests, but also by evangelical pastors, etc., so does it seem fair to you that a righteous person says, every Sunday beating his chest, who sinned through his fault along with the truly unjust? With an unjust person who really does unjust things? With an unjust person who is evil, that is, that the good person says along with the evil person: “it is my great fault”? Is that fair? So, what I intend is, to free these people who are just, because the just do exist, from this chain of deception, because it is like a game of guinea pig. It is interesting, but it is like a game of guinea pig. On one side you have the Catholic Church and on the other side you have the Protestants, right? And you have the people who are being, let’s say harassed, hounded by both groups, right? The Protestants harass you, and on one side the Catholic Church presents itself as a different option when in reality it is the same thing. The Jehovah’s Witness is standing there asking you to read the Bible, to be part of his group, and if not, you are of the world. And on the other side, the Catholic Church presents itself as a liberal alternative, saying that They give freedom and so on and so forth. But in the end it’s the same because it’s the same Bible, the same past as the Catholic Church, because it’s the Catholic Church that has defined in the councils what the Bible has, and if you read what the Bible has and you’re observant, and you read it without prejudice, you’re going to see lies galore: contradictions, inconsistencies, it’s not trustworthy, this isn’t about «law versus grace», everything is messed up,From the Old Testament of the Bible to the New Testament of the Bible, you’ll see contradictions and inconsistencies everywhere. It’s obvious that whoever falsified a message didn’t respect the foundation of that message; it’s pure logic. That is, those who didn’t respect the message of Christ, because I personally believe that Christ did exist, right? They have not respected the messages of the religion of Christ either, and have presented it as a single package called the Bible, where that book is, a trace of Roman manipulation, I will tell you an example of the many that I talk about on my page: Observe, Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hates the unjust and the unjust hates the righteous, keep that in mind, Revelation 6:10 says that the messengers of the message, excuse the redundancy, of God, those who spread the message of God ask for revenge, then you start to think: If those who spread the word of God or the message of God ask for revenge because they have been killed for spreading that word … That is, Revelation 6: 9-10 says that those who died for spreading the true message of God ask God for revenge, you start to think «And the love of the enemy?» They have no love for their enemies, and this is in harmony with Proverbs 29:27: The righteous hate the wicked, and the wicked the righteous. So think, if they have no love for their enemies, could they have preached the opposite? Could they have preached: Love your enemy? Did you notice? It doesn’t fit, it doesn’t fit, there is manipulation, what better sign than that? And so on, if you analyze, you will see a series of lies that make the Bible a book not worthy of credit. However, the governments that govern us, whether they are left, right, or center, when they come to power, take an oath with the Bible under their hand, they swear in front of a cross with their hand on the Bible, so who is governing? The Church, obviously not in a formal, obvious way, but in a tacit way, right? In practice, practically, because when you swear by something you are saying that that something is above you, so when they swear by the Bible they are saying that those who are behind the Bible are above them. And who is behind the Bible? The past of the Catholic Church, which was defined by a few councils, so who governs? the Church, the Roman Emperor has not died, he has been transformed, he continues to govern, do I make myself clear? But what I want is for people who do not deserve to take the blame for evils beyond their control not to say: «through my great fault», for sins that are not injustices but are things against the interests of those organizations. Do I make myself clear? I mean, they teach people that wanting justice is a sin, for example the death penalty, right? You see a murderer killing unjustly with arbitrariness, and you think, a just person like me, because I consider myself that way: «he must be punished with the same rod,He killed unjustly and must be executed with the death penalty,” it seems to me, and the hypocrite comes and says to you, “Oh sinner, God said you shall not kill.” And why don’t you tell that to that murderer instead of telling him that God loves him like he says, or like a certain deceased pope said? A certain pope said that God loves everyone, and that same deceased pope said no to the death penalty, that no one deserves it. Do you see? He says, or said, that the murderer is loved by God, and he also said that he doesn’t deserve the death penalty, and obviously, being the head of that church, that church teaches that desiring justice is a sin. Do you see? They call a sin against God what is really a sin against their interests, because if people start to reason outside of their programming and start to think that if God is all-powerful and is everywhere and no one can hide from him, then you can pray to God anywhere without having to go to any church and without having to use any object because God is not deaf and can hear you without you using any image. But it’s not convenient for them because if people thought like that, no one would go to mass and they would not give value to their images, greetings.

The following is a refined script of what I spoke spontaneously in the video below, recorded by me on the last week of May 2025, and has been fine-tuned for better translation into other languages:
The face of Zeus on the Shroud of Turin: a faithful reflection of the unfaithful Hellenistic lies in the Bible.
What’s up? If you’re looking to believe in something that has a basis or that has some logical argument, you’ll like this video. If you’re one of those who likes to belong to any group and say amen to any story they tell you, regardless of whether it has any basis or not, this channel is not for you. But if you like logic, if you like reasoning, if you like coherent arguments and dogmas, this channel is for you. This video is for you. If you don’t like to believe for the sake of believing, if you like to believe with foundations. I am not the leader of any religious group. I don’t have a group. I mean, I’m not introducing you to a new religion so you’ll belong to a new religion, nothing to do with it. I mean, I’m doing it on my own. There’s no group, no temple, nothing. I’m simply denouncing the lies I’ve encountered over the past seven years or more, basically that’s it. My goal is to ensure that people who don’t deserve to be deceived are not deceived. Now I’m going to tell you something. Look, for example, let’s suppose that this part of the Bible is true, that Jesus said, «Beware of false prophets,» right? «Beware of false prophets.» Think about it: if Jesus was warning something, was that warning for everyone? Yes or no? No, because that warning wasn’t for the false prophets. Do I make myself clear? I’ll repeat it again so you can better explain: if Jesus warned against false prophets who come dressed as lambs but inside are wolves, think about it: was his message for everyone? because let’s assume that that is part of his message, let’s assume that the part where he warned about false prophets is true, if that part of his message [is] true, obviously it wasn’t in favor of everyone because it was to the detriment of the false prophets whom he was unmasking, you have to think: was the rest of his message then in favor of everyone? Yes or no? Because just as that message was detrimental to the false prophet who was dressed in sheep’s clothing but was a false prophet, so the rest of his message, that is, the true gospel, was not good for everyone, it was a good gospel for some. Good news, but not for everyone but for some and those some… guess who they were: the righteous, they have always been the righteous: Noah the righteous, Lot the righteous, it was never good news or a good gospel for everyone only for the righteous, just like the warning. Obviously, the false prophet who heard the words, «Beware of false prophets who come in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves,» didn’t like that, and so on. The true message the Romans were pursuing wasn’t one of universal love; it wasn’t a message that was good for everyone, and all others needed to do was listen to it to feel blessed. It wasn’t a universal blessing.It wasn’t love for the enemy, do I make myself clear? I think that up to here, if you agree with me on this basic logic, then we can move forward, and you’ll agree with me on many things. Now, the person speaking to you was a computer programmer, so logic is my thing. I’m a very good programmer, and I have some algorithms that I’ve placed on my website so that you can see that I’m serious. I mean, I like logic. So, I’ve already taught you one point. Now, let’s continue reasoning. «Gospel,» as I was saying, means «good news.» Justice, what is justice? Justice is a good message, good? For whom, ah? For the innocent. And for whom isn’t justice good? For the guilty. That’s exactly what the true gospel was like, that is, the true gospel was like a message that was good news for the righteous, but it was not good news for the tyrants, oppressors, charlatans, swindlers… and these are the ones who have killed the spreaders of the good news simply because it was not good news for them because they felt identified with Lot’s harassers, with the wicked people who wanted to cause problems for Lot, etc. I mean, that is to say, the Romans felt alluded to when they were described as not chosen, as unjust, so these guys falsified everything, why?, to incorporate a universalist gospel, universal, of global inclusion where anyone can be accepted, love of the enemy that is one of the great lies, of the great lies that the Romans have put in the original message, and obviously, if they dared to falsify the original message that Jesus and his disciples had, they have also meddled with the Old Testament that is in the Bible, I mean, that is to say, what is in the Bible that is called the Old Testament also has manipulations, why do I know this? because I have been reading and I have found serious inconsistencies, very serious, that point to the Romans or to those who were behind the councils, as the authors behind these contradictions, and now the message that is in Matthew 5 of love of the enemy I am going to deny below on this board, take note and search on the internet for the things that you are going to see here, I’m not telling you to necessarily look for my website, search on the internet and you’ll realize on your own that I’m not lying, let’s see, let’s get to the point. As always, the board with the summary of the most relevant messages. This triangle of prophecies refutes the love of the enemy, I can’t tell you everything obviously in a single video there is too much to say, but that’s what my website is for, this one here [NTIEND.ME]. But here I’m going to tell you how I refute the love of the enemy with just three prophecies: Isaiah 42 speaks of the servant of God who brings justice through truth,If you read the entire chapter you will see that God does not love his enemies and you will also see that justice is brought here, right? He will not tire until justice reigns on Earth. He will bring justice. How? With the truth, with the truth. Now this fits perfectly with Daniel 12:1, where the anointed of God, that is, the messenger of God Daniel 12:1 brings justice. Why? Because those who teach justice will shine. In Daniel 12, in Daniel 12 verse 1 a servant of God rises up, coinciding with Isaiah 42:1 [which] also says [that] a servant of God rises up, who would be the same, brings justice, here it speaks of justice and here it speaks of justice, observe in Isaiah 42:13 it says that God rises like a mighty giant and fights and prevails against his enemies, there is no love for the enemy, also Isaiah 42 says that he will guide some along the way, he will guide some, not all; And [it says] that those who say to the images that they are their gods, that is, those who pray to the images, are going to be very confused, why? because there it says «And those who say to the statues «you are our gods» will be extremely confused; Obviously the charlatan is going to tell you that they know that it is not God [the image to which they pray], but the mere fact of praying to an image is already having it as God because that is what the ancients and polytheists did with the statues, they prayed to it because it was a way of worshiping different gods, so they are going to be very confused, why are they going to be confused? Because God confuses them through that messenger who is going to rise at the end time to make the judgment with the truth to bring the justice of Isaiah 42, now the same thing happens here in Daniel 12:1, it says that some are going to be confused forever look in Daniel 12:1-2 I believe, it says [that] some are going to be eternally confused and Isaiah 42 has a part that says: “those who say to the images or molten statues “you are our gods” will be extremely confused”, that is, those who pray to the statues, but not all those who pray to the statues, There are some who pray to the statues that are of the people of God but they do it simply because they do not know the truth, that was my case, I prayed to images when I was Catholic. I was Catholic, but little by little I was investigating and I was liberated, so that is why here in Daniel 12 it says «At that time your people will be delivered, who are written in the book.» It refers to the righteous, the righteous will be saved because Daniel 12:10 says that the unrighteous will continue to be unrighteous and will not change and here what does it say?, «I will guide the blind», obviously it is not referring to the blind in the literal sense of the word, but it is referring to those who do not see because these who do not see only need information, through the truth he will bring justice, he will guide.God is going to guide the righteous through other righteous people, that’s why Daniel 12:3 says «Those who are wise and those who turn the righteous into righteousness will shine forth,» look at this detail: «those who teach righteousness» that is, it is not just one, there are several who go out to guide the righteous along the right path, [not the unrighteous] because the unrighteous cannot straighten their path, because a wolf is not the same as a lost sheep, a stray sheep is not the same as a wolf, do I make myself understood? That is, the righteous are going to be guided along the right path where the sheep must pass safely, on the other hand, the wolves are going to be scared or hunted, love is not for everyone, the good shepherd would not love the sheep and the wolves. It was the wolves of the Roman Empire who have lied with the story of loving the enemy, why? So that the sheep trusts in the wolf, and the sheep should not trust in the wolf. The sheep does not must believe, the sheep must not believe that, treating the wolf well, the wolf will behave like a sheep and will give it good treatment for good treatment. The wolf looks for the opportunity to devour the sheep, which is why there is a part that has survived the fraud that is in Sirach or Ecclesiasticus 12:1-2, where it says: Do good looking at whom, do not do good to just anyone. In Psalm 109:4-5 there is a warning: there are people who repay good with evil. In other words, treating everyone well because I would like to be treated well does not work, it only works between righteous people; not between righteous and unrighteous people. In other words, the wicked will always repay you good with evil, there is no point in doing good to them because they will betray you anyway. And also, now that we have touched on the subject, the doctrine of loving your enemy is a copy of the phrase of Cleobulus of Lindos, search the internet for Cleobulus of Lindos, there is a page called mundifrases.com, that’s where I found it. You’ll see that there’s a saying from him, from that wise Greek man who says, «Do good to your friends and enemies because that way you’ll be able to keep the former and attract the latter.» That is, it gives you to understand that if you love your enemy, your enemy can become a friend. It doesn’t work, Jesus didn’t teach it, the admiring Romans, the Greeks, have incorporated that phrase of Cleobulus of Lindos into the words of Christ, but Christ never said it, because Christ, if what he said in Matthew 5:17-18 is true, «I have come to fulfill the law of the prophets,» then he would have to be in harmony with the prophecy of Isaiah, and in the prophecy in Isaiah 42 we don’t see a God who loves everyone but only some, just like in Daniel 12:1. Why does the angel of the Lord rise up in Daniel 12:1 in favor of some and not in favor of all? Why would God send his angel only in favor of some at the end time? Be careful, read it yourself, don’t let someone else read it for you, read Daniel 12 verse 1 and the other verses yourself and you will see that God sends an angel in favor of some people, not in favor of everyone,If God loved everyone, the message would say that God sends that angel in favor of all humanity and it is not like that because the love of God is not for all humanity, he has always had chosen ones, all life, and the chosen ones are the righteous, the righteous because the righteous are the ones who teach justice, an unjust person cannot teach you justice because it is something he does not understand and does not value, the righteous can, that is why Daniel 12:3 says what it says. Now let’s go to Psalm 110 the prophecy of judgment where God tells his son «Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet», from there he judges the nations. Who? It is Christ in his return, here it is, Psalm 110, but it turns out that Christ in his return is precisely that character spoken of in Daniel 12:1 and that character spoken of in Isaiah 42:1 and his return is not with the… how can I tell you? [it is not] descending from heaven literally like that [from] the cloud like a bird, a lie because he never resurrected and because he never ascended to heaven, [that] is one of the great lies that I have refuted, that I have dismantled in this blog, on this [web] page here, that you see here. Here I am dismantling the lie of the love of the enemy, but I have dismantled many other lies, this video is not enough to tell you all the lies in the Bible, a product of the deception of the Romans that I have refuted. So here if you read Psalm 110 you will see that God judges, that there are a people who offer themselves to him voluntarily, that is, There are people who voluntarily go to help him, the one who sits at the right hand of God, and there is also a very important event, that judgment produces thousands of deaths or millions, read Psalm 110:6 “He will judge between the nations, he will fill them with corpses,” that is in Psalm 110:6 as a single context. The context of judgment is not good for everyone, as always, it is good for some, not for everyone. Why did the Pope who died say that God loves everyone? Why is he lying? Look, I’m going to tell you something, today in the morning there was a ridiculous comment where a guy was praising the current Pope, I don’t remember what it’s called, I think it’s called something from 14, and I said “Why are you praising him so much?” That guy is deceiving humanity like all the Popes do, and the guy also said that the entire Catholic Church, ([I say this] because I was Catholic too), are as one. No, it can’t be, you can’t put everyone in the same bag, you know why? Because not everyone is to blame, when I was a child and I was [ignorant], I was Catholic too, but I was ignorant, you understand? I just let myself be carried away by the masses and I listened and said «Amen,» because I thought that the majority couldn’t be wrong, my parents, the society where I live, almost 95% of Peruvians were Catholic and I was too, but once I investigated and read then I realized and I began to protest but what’s the difference? The priest,The cleric has also read what I’ve read, but does he tell you about these inconsistencies? No! He turns a blind eye and continues deceiving people with the story of the resurrection, with the story of loving one’s enemy. Not me. That’s why we’re not all equal. You can’t lump every Catholic into the same bag. I mean, I don’t condemn a person for their religion; I judge them by their reaction to a message of justice. If you show them a message of justice and the guy insists on defending injustice, defending lies, slander, then I judge them. But I can’t say, «No, [that one] is lost [forever],» because I myself was Catholic too. I can’t curse or say that the Catholic is bad because I was Catholic too. I simply would like the good Catholic, that is, the good person who is Catholic, to know the truth so that they can escape from deception, just as I did. Now, a Catholic is also a criminal; a criminal is also Catholic. A drug trafficker, a pedophile priest, also calls himself Catholic. I mean, there are all kinds of Catholics, good and bad. I want to help good Catholics so they’re not deceived. They don’t deserve to be deceived. I consider myself righteous, and I believe there are other righteous men like me, and righteous women. And I don’t want those people to be deceived. There are people who don’t deserve to be deceived, and I’m for them, in their favor. Just like Miguel would do, right? A coincidence. But I’m in favor of the righteous, and not just of the Catholic religion, of any religion that can free itself with the truth so they stop praying to statues, stop repeating false dogmas. I mean, I’ve done such extensive research that I’ve realized that practically the Roman Empire is behind even Islam, and that this Judaism of Israel, which is known as the Judaism of the Jews, the Judaism of today, is not the same as the Judaism persecuted by the Romans. Because I’ve basically discovered that the Romans persecuted a Judaism that was different from Christianity, different from the Judaism that is known, the Judaism that the Jews of Israel believe in, for example, different from that religion, different from Islam, different from Christianity, and obviously different from branches of Christianity like Catholicism, totally different from anything that is known. That’s basically what I’ve been concluding from my research. So I’ve realized that the same thing I’ve discovered can be useful to any coherent person who doesn’t like to be deceived, so I’ve doneIf you show him a message of justice and the guy insists on defending injustice, defending lies, slander, then I will judge him. But I can’t say, «No, [that one] is lost [forever],» because I myself was Catholic too. I can’t curse or say that the Catholic is bad because I was Catholic too. I simply would like the good Catholic, that is, the good person who is Catholic, to know the truth so that they can escape from deception, just as I did. Now, a Catholic is also a criminal; a criminal is also Catholic. A drug trafficker, a pedophile priest also calls himself Catholic, so there are all kinds of Catholics, good and bad. I want to help good Catholics so that they are not deceived. They do not deserve to be deceived. I consider myself just and I believe that there are other just men like me, and just women, and I don’t want those people to be deceived. There are people who do not deserve to be deceived, and I am for them, on their side. Just like Miguel would do, right? A coincidence. But I’m in favor of the righteous, and not just the Catholic religion, any religion, that can be liberated with the truth so they stop praying to statues, stop repeating false dogmas. I mean, I’ve done such extensive research that I’ve realized that practically the Roman Empire is behind even Islam, and that this Judaism of Israel, which is known as the Judaism of the Jews, the Judaism of today, is not the same as the Judaism persecuted by the Romans. Because I’ve basically discovered that the Romans persecuted a Judaism different from Christianity, different from the Judaism as it is known, the Judaism in which the Jews of Israel believe, for example, different from that religion, different from Islam, different from Christianity, and obviously different from branches of Christianity like Catholicism, completely different from anything known. That’s basically what I’ve concluded from my research. Then I realized that the same thing I have discovered can be useful to any coherent person who does not like to be deceived, so I have doneIf you show him a message of justice and the guy insists on defending injustice, defending lies, slander, then I will judge him. But I can’t say, «No, [that one] is lost [forever],» because I myself was Catholic too. I can’t curse or say that the Catholic is bad because I was Catholic too. I simply would like the good Catholic, that is, the good person who is Catholic, to know the truth so that they can escape from deception, just as I did. Now, a Catholic is also a criminal; a criminal is also Catholic. A drug trafficker, a pedophile priest also calls himself Catholic, so there are all kinds of Catholics, good and bad. I want to help good Catholics so that they are not deceived. They do not deserve to be deceived. I consider myself just and I believe that there are other just men like me, and just women, and I don’t want those people to be deceived. There are people who do not deserve to be deceived, and I am for them, on their side. Just like Miguel would do, right? A coincidence. But I’m in favor of the righteous, and not just the Catholic religion, any religion, that can be liberated with the truth so they stop praying to statues, stop repeating false dogmas. I mean, I’ve done such extensive research that I’ve realized that practically the Roman Empire is behind even Islam, and that this Judaism of Israel, which is known as the Judaism of the Jews, the Judaism of today, is not the same as the Judaism persecuted by the Romans. Because I’ve basically discovered that the Romans persecuted a Judaism different from Christianity, different from the Judaism as it is known, the Judaism in which the Jews of Israel believe, for example, different from that religion, different from Islam, different from Christianity, and obviously different from branches of Christianity like Catholicism, completely different from anything known. That’s basically what I’ve concluded from my research. Then I realized that the same thing I have discovered can be useful to any coherent person who does not like to be deceived, so I have doneJust like Miguel would do, right? A coincidence. But I’m in favor of the righteous, and not just the Catholic religion, any religion, that can be liberated with the truth so they stop praying to statues, stop repeating false dogmas. I mean, I’ve done such extensive research that I’ve realized that practically the Roman Empire is behind even Islam, and that this Judaism of Israel, which is known as the Judaism of the Jews, the Judaism of today, is not the same as the Judaism persecuted by the Romans. Because I’ve basically discovered that the Romans persecuted a Judaism different from Christianity, different from the Judaism as it is known, the Judaism in which the Jews of Israel believe, for example, different from that religion, different from Islam, different from Christianity, and obviously different from branches of Christianity like Catholicism, completely different from anything known. That’s basically what I’ve concluded from my research. Then I realized that the same thing I have discovered can be useful to any coherent person who does not like to be deceived, so I have doneJust like Miguel would do, right? A coincidence. But I’m in favor of the righteous, and not just the Catholic religion, any religion, that can be liberated with the truth so they stop praying to statues, stop repeating false dogmas. I mean, I’ve done such extensive research that I’ve realized that practically the Roman Empire is behind even Islam, and that this Judaism of Israel, which is known as the Judaism of the Jews, the Judaism of today, is not the same as the Judaism persecuted by the Romans. Because I’ve basically discovered that the Romans persecuted a Judaism different from Christianity, different from the Judaism as it is known, the Judaism in which the Jews of Israel believe, for example, different from that religion, different from Islam, different from Christianity, and obviously different from branches of Christianity like Catholicism, completely different from anything known. That’s basically what I’ve concluded from my research. Then I realized that the same thing I have discovered can be useful to any coherent person who does not like to be deceived, so I have doneA summary in 24 languages where I debunk the main religious deceptions, not only of Christianity, but also of Islam and Judaism.What happens is this, I’m going to tell you, why, for example, is Islam an indirect work of the Roman Empire? Why are the Romans behind it? because it has the same lie that is in Christianity: the virgin birth of Jesus that I have denied in total detail on my website. I cannot tell you all the details here but I will tell you some things so that you can look it up yourself on my website: Isaiah 7 speaks of a virgin giving birth: Isaiah chapter 7, and Isaiah says this to King Ahaz, but at no time is he referring to Jesus [to his birth], [he] is referring to King Hezekiah [to his birth], about whom you can see in 2 Kings 18, that King Hezekiah was the Emmanuel of whom the prophet Isaiah spoke to King Ahaz, [Hezekiah] was the son, the future son of King Ahaz, read Isaiah 7 there Isaiah [practically] tells him «Do not fear King Ahaz, because those kings that you fear will fall before your son knows how to distinguish good from evil (2 Kings 15:29-30)”, “and the virgin will give birth and they will call her son Immanuel.” The virgin [of whom] he is talking about the future mother of King Hezekiah, who at that time was a virgin but [who] obviously, for obvious reasons, was going to stop being a virgin after joining King Ahaz, to have King Hezekiah as a son, and this was more or less 700 years before Christ and those things happened with the king of Hezekiah because Emmanuel means God among us but it does not mean God made man among us, nothing to do with it [And Jesus was never God among us because God the son is not the same as God the Father [Psalm 82, John 10:34, Deuteronomy 4:15]], I did not mean “among us” as they have translated it, it means “God is with us defending us”, it is God with us God on our behalf and Hezekiah represented that for the Jews of his time because God was with him and made him prevail against his enemies and with him the prophecy of Isaiah 7 was fulfilled (2 Kings 19:35-37), that is the context Isaiah never referred to the birth of Jesus 7 centuries later and that a woman would continue to be a virgin despite everything. That is a big lie and what’s wrong with people? Most people have not read the Bible to realize the lies, I mean, I’m not saying that the entire Old Testament is the truth and the New Testament is a lie, no, because for obvious reasons the same ones who falsified the message of the New Testament have also adulterated the message of the Old Testament, it’s obvious, if not, it would be very simple to disprove the false gospel if we only guide ourselves from the Old Testament, obviously the manipulation is also in the Old Testament. It’s everywhere, I’m not defending the Bible, I defend some truths that seem coherent, but I’m not defending any known religion, I’m denouncing these things because I don’t want the righteous to be fooled, who do not deserve to be deceived.I think a con man deserves to be deceived, but I don’t want an honest person to deserve to be deceived. And well, what I was telling you is that the same lie that Jesus was born a virgin is in Islam, Islam also defends that Jesus was born a virgin, coincidence? It can’t be a coincidence, since the Roman Empire is behind it, and it turns out that Bahira, Muhammad’s mentor, was a monk from a branch of Christianity, that is, a Christian monk was Muhammad’s mentor, and he told Muhammad that he was going to be a great prophet. What a coincidence? no and remember that Islam has existed more or less since the 7th century, that is to say, Christianity came first, which obviously, Christianity, for the reasons explained: because it says that Jesus rose again, because it says that Jesus was born of a virgin, for those things that I just told you, Christianity is not the religion that Rome persecuted, it is the religion that Rome created by not wanting to accept the true religion that Rome destroyed, and obviously Rome by destroying the true religion did not respect anything, that is to say, that current Judaism is not a reflection of the true Judaism persecuted by the Romans, much less Islam, much less Christianity: They are religions created by the Roman people and I have better proof on my website, you go to my website antibestia.com and you will see an Excel file in the description line, that is to say, you will see the description of the website and at the end there isAn Excel file has a URL of an Excel file, in that Excel file, you put it in the browser and you will be able to download the support of everything I am telling you in 24 languages., you can also see it on this website [NTIEND.ME], I have eight websites bestiadn.com, penademuerteya.com, lavirgenmecreera.com ellameencontrara.com, and when I say la virgen me creora.com, just in case I’m not obviously referring to the supposed virgin mother of Jesus, no, I’m not referring to her, I’m referring to an ideal woman that for me, well for my sacred marital purposes. Well, this is a separate topic, the point is that I just showed you that there is no love for the enemy in the final judgment, there is no love for the enemy when God brings his servant to bring justice through the truth, there is no love for all, some will be confused and some will be guided, why? because God does not love everyone equally in Daniel 12:1 God does not send his angel in favor of everyone exactly like in Sodom and Gomorrah, exactly the same. God sent his two angels in Genesis 19, read Genesis 19, in favor of everyone or only in favor of Lot? Another example, the world of Noah, did the angel warn Noah in favor of him only or in favor of everyone else so that everyone gets on the ark? Don’t you see? God has not changed, it is the same God who does not love everyone and if God does not love everyone why does Matthew 5:44-48 say what it says? Because Jesus did not say it, the Romans said it, think about it and if the Romans have dared to put words in the mouth of Jesus that he never said, if they have dared to show us images of their god Zeus and tell us that he is the image of Jesus, what would the Romans not have dared to do? What else have they not falsified? Think about it, if they have falsified something so rude as the love of the enemy that does not fit with the law or the prophets, that does not fit with anything not even logic, what else have the Romans adulterated? How many deceptions in the Bible? Here I cannot tell you everything I have seen even in Genesis, from Genesis to Revelation, all the books of the Bible have lies, even some entire books are totally false, it is impressive and good as was being said, I created this video because in my youth I would have liked to find a video like this that I am creating to avoid mistakes and bad decisions that I made by following bad advice like praying because she insults me because there was a woman named Sandra who insulted me in a complex circumstance to tell here and confused me on purpose, and in my confusion I made the big mistake… instead of getting away from her, [I] prayed for her thinking that the advice of Matthew 5 was good, but in the end things went worse for me. I’ve also talked about that on my own website. In that same file, I also tell that experience. I don’t want other righteous men or righteous people to make mistakes because of the bad information that these charlatans present as the word of God. It’s not the word of God, it’s the words of the Roman Empire. Well, that’s it. Greetings from Lima, Peru, I’m José.
Unmasking the impostor: the true physical appearance of the Angel Gabriel according to the Scriptures (Video language: Chinese) https://youtu.be/Qkpjgm5a51g
Where are the chosen ones in the world? They are God's people who will be free forever. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/7yHRo6PraZg
The truth is light, and through the light all the righteous will pass because only they will see the light because only they will understand the truth, Luz Victoria is one of them, she is a righteous woman. Psalm 118:19 Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will enter through them, I will praise the Lord. 20 This is the gate of the Lord; the righteous will enter through it. Seeing the light means understanding the truth. The Romans have said that truth is a message with contradictions, like the one in Matthew 5:48-48 that tells you that doing good only to those who do good to you is not merit, while in Matthew 25:31-46 the merit is in doing good only to those who do good to you.

And they also say that the truth is their long-haired god, that god Jupiter, the Greek Zeus that they proclaim with their images, they did it through a false gospel that says of him: «I am the truth, I am the door, worship me all you gods (Hebrews 1:6, John 14:16)». It was to be assumed that those murderers hated the truth and that is why they have deceived and falsified the true messages, and continuied to deceive by saying: «We no longer persecute that religion, now we spread it.» My «UFO» NTIEND.ME, emits light. That light destroys the slanders of the dragon or Satan, whose name means «the slanderer.»

Are you a righteous man like I am? Then create your own «UFOs» and let’s go for what belongs to us: Glory, honor and immortality!
Romans 2:6-7 For God «will pay each person according to what his works deserve.» He will give eternal life to those who, by perseverance in good works, seek glory, honor, and immortality. 1 Corinthians 11:7 A woman is the glory of a man. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD will take a virgin from his own people as his wife. Daniel 12:13 Daniel, you will live again to receive your inheritance at the end of the days. Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Revelation 1:6 He has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. Isaiah 66:21 And I will take some of them also to be priests and Levites, says the LORD.



What was the goddess of the Babylonians?
ChatGPT said: The main goddess of the Babylonians was Ishtar.
Didn’t Ishtar hold a baby or her child like a mother goddess?
ChatGPT said: Yes, in some depictions Ishtar appears as a mother goddess, similar to other fertility and motherhood deities of ancient cultures. Some theories suggest that the image of a mother goddess with a child influenced the later depiction of figures such as the Virgin Mary with the Christ Child in Christian tradition, reinforcing the idea that many ancient beliefs were absorbed and reinterpreted.
Importance of idols – In Babylonian religion the following of rituals and the worship of statues of deities was considered sacred, as the gods lived simultaneously in their temple statues and in the natural forces they embodied. An elaborate ceremony of washing the mouths of statues appeared during the Old Babylonian period.



Righteous brother, in the light of truth you will see Babylon as she is.
Then belief in her lies will not be the parasites of your intellect.



The truth is a coherent message, the truth is an infinite being and not a finite one like its messenger. The truth is light, and through the light all the righteous will pass because only they will see the light because only they will understand the truth, Luz Victoria is one of them, she is a righteous woman. Psalm 118:19 Open to me the gates of justice; I will enter through them, I will praise the Eternal. 20 This is the gate of the Eternal; the righteous will enter through it. Seeing the light means understanding the truth. The Romans have said that the truth is a message with contradictions, like the one in Matthew 5:48-48 that tells you that doing good only to those who do good to you is not merit, while in Matthew 25:31-46 the merit is in doing good only to those who do good to you. And they also say that the truth is their long-haired god, that god Jupiter, the Greek Zeus that they proclaim with their images, they did it through a false gospel that says of him: «I am the truth, I am the door, worship me all you gods (Hebrews 1:6, John 14:16) «. It was to be assumed that those murderers hated the truth and that is why they deceived and falsified their messages, and continuing to be deceived they said: «We no longer persecute that religion, now we spread it.» Do you think we are all blind that having the truth in our noses we do not realize it? Do you think that everyone seeing does not see that they continue to worship their same gods? Those polytheists are not the ones to give us lessons on how to worship only the Eternal!
Importance of Idols – In Babylonian religion the following of rituals and the worship of statues of deities was considered sacred, as the gods lived simultaneously in their temple statues and in the natural forces they embodied. An elaborate ceremony of washing the mouths of statues appeared during the early Babylonian period.
Revelation 17:5 And on her forehead a name was written, Mystery, Babylon the great, The mother of harlotry and of the abominations of the earth. 6 And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I marveled with great wonder.
Acts 19:23 Then arose no small stir about the Way. 24 For a certain goldsmith named Demetrius, which made silver shrines of Diana, brought unto the craftsmen no small gain: 25 And when he had assembled them together with the masters of this trade, he said, Men, you know that we have profit by this trade; 26 And you see and hear that this Paul, not only in Ephesus, but throughout almost all Asia, has turned away many people by persuasion, saying, Those made with hands are not gods. 27 And not only is there danger that this business will become a reproach to us, but also that the temple of the great goddess Diana will be esteemed as nothing, and her majesty, which all Asia and the world glorifies, will begin to be destroyed. 28 When they heard these things, they were filled with wrath, and cried out, saying, Great is Diana of the Ephesians! 29 And the city was filled with confusion, and they rushed with one accord into the theater, seizing Gaius and Aristarchus, Macedonians, Paul’s companions.
Matthew 10:35 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it. (At the time of the end (Daniel 12:1))
Habakkuk 2:18 What good is the graven image that the maker has carved? A molten image that teaches lies, so that the maker trusts in his work, making mute images? 19 Woe to him who says to wood, «Awake!» or to silent stone, «Arise!» Can he teach? Behold, he is overlaid with gold and silver, and there is no breath in him. 20 But the LORD is in his holy temple; let all the earth keep silence before him.
1 Corinthians 10:21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.
Revelation 14:9-10 «If anyone worships the beast (1 Corinthians 2:14) and his image (Exodus 20:4-5, Daniel 3:1-6), and receives his mark on his forehead (John 8:44-45, 1 John 4:3 (Psalm 110, Psalm 118:6-26 (Matthew 21:37-44))) or on his hand (Matthew 7:16, 2 Corinthians 11:15, Revelation 9:20), he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb.»
They neither respected the lives of the saints, nor did they respect the commandments against idolatry, they have falsified the message of justice with slander, they have attributed teachings such as «love for the enemy» to the saints, including Jesus. That is why the Bible has lies from the Romans. Observe how those who lost their lives for the same cause as Jesus cry out for vengeance, if love for enemies had been part of the gospel they had, they would not hate their enemies invoking vengeance against them: Revelation 6:9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the testimony which they held. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, do you not judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth? But God judges through them, they are judges and are part: Revelation 6:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat on them to whom judgment was committed, and I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony about Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or its image, and who had not received its mark on their foreheads or on their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years (and forever).
Psalm 41:4-13 tells us that the man who was betrayed by the one who ate his bread has sinned, but that God raises him up to take revenge on his enemy. 1 Peter 2:22-23 tells us that Jesus never sinned, that He never took revenge on His enemies. However, John 13:18 says that the prophecy of betrayal in Psalm 41:9 was fulfilled in Jesus being betrayed by Judas: John 13:18 I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen. But the Scripture must be fulfilled: “He who eats bread with Me has lifted up his foot against Me.” This is contradictory, another proof of Roman adulteration against the genuine gospel.
The Bible claims that Jesus was born of a virgin, but this contradicts the context of the prophecy in Isaiah 7. The apocryphal Gospels, including the Gospel of Philip, also perpetuate this idea. However, Isaiah’s prophecy refers to the birth of King Hezekiah, not Jesus. Hezekiah was born of a woman who was a virgin at the time when the prophecy was made, not after she became pregnant, and the prophecy of Emmanuel was fulfilled with Hezekiah, not Jesus. Rome has hidden the true Gospel and used apocryphal texts to distract and legitimize the main lies. Jesus did not fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies about Emmanuel, and the Bible misinterprets the meaning of the virgin in Isaiah 7.
Finding Contradictory Passages in the Bible:
Isaiah 7:14-16: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel. He will eat curds and honey when he knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right. For before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste.”
This passage mentions a virgin who will conceive a son named Immanuel, meaning “God with us.” The prophecy was given to King Ahaz and pertains to the immediate political situation, specifically the destruction of the lands of the two kings Ahaz fears (Pekah and Rezin). This aligns with the historical context and timeline of King Hezekiah’s birth, not Jesus.
2 Kings 15:29-30: “In the days of Pekah king of Israel, Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria came and took Ijon, Abel Beth Maacah, Janoah, Kedesh, Hazor, Gilead and Galilee, including all the land of Naphtali; and he carried the people captive to Assyria. Hoshea son of Elah conspired against Pekah son of Remaliah. He attacked him and killed him, and then succeeded him as king, in the twentieth year of Jotham son of Uzziah.”
This describes the fall of Pekah and Rezin, fulfilling Isaiah’s prophecy about the two kings’ lands being deserted before the child (Hezekiah) knows to reject wrong and choose right.
2 Kings 18:4-7: “He removed the high places, smashed the sacred stones and cut down the Asherah poles. He broke into pieces the bronze snake Moses had made, for up to that time the Israelites had been burning incense to it. It was called Nehushtan. He trusted in the Lord, the God of Israel. There was no one like him among all the kings of Judah, either before him or after him. He held fast to the Lord and did not cease to follow him; he kept the commands the Lord had given Moses. And the Lord was with him; he was successful in whatever he undertook. He rebelled against the king of Assyria and did not serve him.”
Highlights Hezekiah’s reforms and his faithfulness to God, showing that “God was with him,” fulfilling the name Immanuel in Hezekiah’s context.
Isaiah 7:21-22 and 2 Kings 19:29-31: “In that day, a man will keep alive a young cow and two goats. And because of the abundance of milk they give, he will have curds to eat. All who remain in the land will eat curds and honey.” / “This will be the sign for you, Hezekiah: This year you will eat what grows by itself, and the second year what springs from that. But in the third year sow and reap, plant vineyards and eat their fruit. The remnant of the kingdom of Judah will again take root below and bear fruit above. For out of Jerusalem will come a remnant, and out of Mount Zion a band of survivors. The zeal of the Lord Almighty will accomplish this.”
Both passages speak of abundance and prosperity in the land, correlating with Hezekiah’s reign, supporting the interpretation that the prophecy in Isaiah referred to Hezekiah.
2 Kings 19:35-37: “That night the angel of the Lord went out and put to death a hundred and eighty-five thousand in the Assyrian camp. When the people got up the next morning—there were all the dead bodies! So Sennacherib king of Assyria broke camp and withdrew. He returned to Nineveh and stayed there. One day, while he was worshiping in the temple of his god Nisroch, his sons Adrammelech and Sharezer cut him down with the sword, and they escaped to the land of Ararat. And Esarhaddon his son succeeded him as king.”
Describes the miraculous defeat of the Assyrians, which was prophesied by Isaiah, showing God’s intervention and support for Hezekiah, further indicating that the Immanuel prophecy was about Hezekiah.
The reign of false religions, this may sound paradoxical because I quote a passage from the Bible, but Christianity is among those false religions, here I explain why: Revelation 13:7 And he was permitted to make war against the saints and defeat them. It was also given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation. Download the document
La persecución religiosa en el Perú – El caso de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza (Mi caso)Descarga
This is how the fraud operates.Download
Michael and his angels throw Zeus and his angels into the abyss of hell. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/n1b8Wbh6AHI
Riddle, what are we talking about?: From the moment you are born they are already accusing you saying: «He was born with original sin and he needs to be baptized.» When your parents take you to their church there they teach you to beat your chest saying this: «I confess that I have sinned and I also confess that it is my fault, my great fault.» If you have enemies who attack you, they tell you: «If you want to be forgiven for your sins, forgive your enemies, remember that we are all sinners.«. If you transgress the doctrines of that church, they call you a sinner and tell you that you transgress God’s rules, I understand that God is an uncreated being and is superior; If justice is a higher value, would God be in favor of condemning the innocent along with the guilty?, That church is the remnant of an empire that persecuted a group of people who respected justice, the Roman empire was a empire that destroyed the scriptures of the faith that it persecuted, however they tell you that that empire converted to the faith that it persecuted and that it began to preach the messages that it persecuted, and they also tell you that in the Bible that they have accepted there are the messages that they persecuted but that they later dedicated themselves to defending, I ask you, do you believe them?, Do they seem trustworthy to you?, If you are righteous, why should you join a group of people whose conscience does accuse them of being unrighteous?, If you are righteous, the best thing you can do is not to carry in your shoulders the blame of others, it is not in your best interest to carry the burden of those unjust who do injustice but who believe that they will be forgiven for following rules handed down from other unjust people and for spreading their lies. Answer: We are talking about the religion of the Devil, the one whom the Romans of the past have worshiped: Man, Zeus, the sun (Triumvirate of the Romans). Among the Romans, Sol Invictus was worshiped, the «Sun Invincible», whose festival was celebrated on the occasion of the solstice of winter on December 25, when, it was believed, it was the coldest night long and, from then on, the sun began to rise again. Exodus 20:5 You shall not bow down to any image to honor it, I am Yahweh your God, a jealous God who hates those who hate him and loves those who love him. Yahweh does not love his enemies: Matthew 5:38-48 is a lie of the Roman beast empire, that empire did not respected neither the commandment, nor the message, nor the physical appearance of Christ: they defamed him with the image of «a Sun made man», in order to continue the idolatry to images of the Sun that the Roman Empire already worshiped when they killed him.
The love of enemies is a deception of the enemy of God, the denial of the law that prohibits the consumption of foods such as pork and bats is also a deception; The Bible has lies from the empire that never converted to the faith that it persecuted, the Roman empire persecuted that faith to destroy it by Hellenizing it. In the version of the gospel falsified by the Romans in Matthew 15:11 Jesus tells us (To deny the law in Deuteronomy 14): "Eat everything because nothing that enters a man's mouth contaminates him", the Romans are thus accusing Jesus of something that as a faithful Jew he never said: Like Antiochus IV Epiphanes, they had in mind to Hellenize the true religion. The gospel was Hellenized by the Romans, like the face of Zeus, so they tell us with the images that it was the face of Jesus; and the doctrine of the Greek Cleobulus of Lindos is the one that says: "Love your enemy", but they tell us that Jesus taught it: And that is a lie. Antiochus IV Epiphanes tortured eight Jews, seven brothers and their mother because they refused to eat pork because God forbids it (Leviticus 11, 2 Maccabees 7). The prophecy in Isaiah 65 confirms two things: 1 # God loves his friends and hates his enemies. 2# The consumption of pork is confirmed prohibited. Antiochus, the Greek king: "Would you like to eat pork so they won't cut your body to pieces? (2 Maccabees 7:7)." Zeus, the Greek god: "Nothing that I God did is bad if you receive it by praying to me, are they going to refuse to eat pork?, worship me all, those who don't, go to eternal fire (1 Timothy 4:3 , Hebrews 1:6, Luke 11:28, Matthew 18:7)." The phrase: "Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way you will preserve the ones and it will be possible for you to attract the others." It is from Cleobulus of Lindos, "love your enemy is another way of saying the same thing", but that contradicts the law and the prophets, Jesus respected the word of God, but the Roman persecutors did not.
Stop your blasphemes! (Matthew 22:30). With your slander against the faithful messager and with your hatred for the law of Jehovah (Leviticus 11, Isaiah 65:4 , Leviticus 21:14, Isaiah 66:21), you insult, like those Greeks, who had you as their god (2 Maccabees 6:2), the blood of faithful Jews who died for love of the law of Jehovah (2 Maccabees 7, 2 Maccabees 6:18-20), I hate the enemies of Jehovah, they are my enemies too, and you will not be able to change my feelings against my enemies, I will take revenge (Psalms 139:17-22). What has been decided will be done (Psalms 18:37-50). If you are not Satan but me, Why are you preaching love to my enemy Satan?. I hate Satan because I love Jehovah. Jehovah’s enemies are also my enemies, and I hate them. Psalms 139:17-22. Your angels dress like those whom Jehovah hates, but my angels do not (Deuteronomy 22:5, Isaiah 3:9), Speaking of which: Why did those men who worship you always draw me without clothes?. Do your men like men? (Genesis 13:13, Genesis 19:4-29, Ezekiel 16:48-50 (Leviticus 18)).
Don't be mistaken about me: Don't confuse me with others.

1 You won’t see him with horns… https://antibestia.com/2025/04/29/you-wont-see-him-with-horns/ 2 Szybki test: Jak możesz udowodnić, że prawdą jest, że wielu jest powołanych, a niewielu wybranych? https://shewillfind.me/2025/01/18/szybki-test-jak-mozesz-udowodnic-ze-prawda-jest-ze-wielu-jest-powolanych-a-niewielu-wybranych/ 3 Las Alucinaciones Fragmentadas de Neveda y la Búsqueda de su Integridad https://ellameencontrara.com/2024/09/13/las-alucinaciones-fragmentadas-de-neveda-y-la-busqueda-de-su-integridad/ 4 La minoría de edad y la pena de muerte. https://penademuerteya.blogspot.com/2024/02/la-minoria-de-edad-y-la-pena-de-muerte.html 5 Tragedia en EEUU, jauría de perros mata a niño de 7 años y deja gravemente herida a su madre que trató de proteger a su hijo. https://elovni01.blogspot.com/2023/01/tragedia-en-eeuu-jauria-de-perros-mata.html

Isaiah 42:12 Give glory to Jehovah and declare his praises the coasts.
Those imbeciles say that they can do bad deeds but it is enough for them to say that they accept a long-haired man with the appearance of a Greek god, as their only lord and enough savior to be free from God's punishment, in turn, they affirm that if a person does righteous works but does not accept that long-haired man as his only lord and sufficient savior, he is under the wrath of God, which god? That false God must be Lucifer, indignant with those who do not worship him, but The righteous do not adore or accept any creature as sufficient savior, but only the Creator of the Universe Jehovah! Hosea 13:4 They will worship no Savior other than Jehovah.
The conclusions of my research: The deception of the Roman Empire in the Bible vs. the message of the persecuted in the time of Christ. : https://ntiend.me/2023/04/06/the-deception-of-the-roman-empire-in-the-bible-vs-the-message-of-the-persecuted-in-the-time-of-christ-el-engano-del-imperio-romano-en-la-biblia-vs-el-mensaje-de-los-perseguidos-en-los-tiempos-de-cri/
Everything is decided in favor of God because God has decided everything and God is never wrong in his decisions. Who is like God?
The final judgment in Daniel’s prophecy which says: But the Judge will sit, and they will take away his dominion, so that it is destroyed and ruined, must be fulfilled… What did Jesus feel for his enemies? What did the saints feel for their enemies? Love or hate? Many will fall back when they notice how they have been fooled and cheated; we should demand compensation from the Vatican and its accomplices for all the time they have made us waste, and I am serious.
Habakkuk 2:7 Will not your debtors suddenly arise, and those who make you tremble awake, and you will become their spoil? 8 Because you have plundered many nations, all the rest of the people will plunder you, because of human bloodshed, and violence to the land, to the cities and all who live in them.
Revelation 6:9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. 10 And they cried out in a loud voice, “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?” The true messengers of Christ and his true message knew the prophecies and knew that their enemies and persecutors intended to impose global deception, as they knew that the prophecy in Daniel 8:25 had to take shape so that in the end times, in Christ’s return, the deception would be destroyed. In Revelation 6:9-10, it is then invoked that God fulfill his promises of justice as stated in prophecies like this: Psalms 58:10 The righteous will be glad when they are avenged; they will bathe their feet in the blood of the wicked. 11 Then people will say, “Surely the righteous still are rewarded; surely there is a God who judges the earth.” Where is the love for enemies in this invocation to God and these prophecies? Nowhere. Jesus also knew in advance that the Romans would never convert to his religion and would destroy his messages and those of his faithful witnesses, so he said this: Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ Just as the message in Revelation 6:9-10 is an allusion to the prophecy in Psalms 58:6-11, this message in Matthew 7:22-23 is an allusion to this prophecy where it is clear that he loves God, but hates his enemies. If he hates his enemies and he was not a hypocrite, then he never said the message in Matthew 5:38-48. It was the hypocritical religious “Roman Catholics” who, with that message in the Bible that says “love your enemies”, massacred many people in the name of their religion in the unholy inquisition, which was always in favor of idols and not justice, because fraud and justice are incompatible:
Psalms 139:17 How precious to me are your thoughts, O God! How vast is the sum of them! 18 Were I to count them, they would outnumber the grains of sand—when I awake, I am still with you. 19 If only you, God, would slay the wicked! Away from me, you bloodthirsty men! 20 They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name (Using God as a pretext, they defend prayers directed to various creatures). 21 Do I not hate those who hate you, Jehovah, and abhor those who are in rebellion against you? 22 I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies. (The righteous hate the wicked, do not love everyone, only the righteous. Jesus was righteous, so he did not love his enemies nor die for them… Proverbs 29:27 The righteous detest the wicked; the wicked detest the righteous. https://youtu.be/GtqL9Cb2yeU )
Psalms 135:14 For Jehovah will vindicate his people and have compassion on his servants. 15 The idols of the nations are silver and gold, made by human hands. 16 They have mouths, but cannot speak, eyes, but cannot see. 17 They have ears, but cannot hear, nor is there breath in their mouths. 18 Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them. (He who has ears to hear, let him hear me… https://youtu.be/e-f_UiTKFx8 )
Isaiah 2:8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So man is humbled, and each one is brought low, do not forgive them!

Not only are they idols, but they are also dishonorable idols!
1 Corinthians 11:14 Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him? 15 But if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
Habakkuk 2:16 You will be filled with shame instead of glory. Now it is your turn! Drink and let your nakedness be exposed! The cup from the Lord’s right hand is coming around to you, and disgrace will cover your glory.
"The religion I defend is named justice. █ I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say. The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ""The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God's blessing."" Proverbs 18:22 — ""A wife is the blessing God gives to a man."" Leviticus 21:14 — ""He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise."" 📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent “official” sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people's personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ""belong."" This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It's not God speaking in his temples. It's Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution. https://ellameencontrara.com/2025/04/17/el-proposito-de-dios-no-es-el-proposito-de-roma-las-religiones-de-roma-conducen-a-sus-propios-intereses-y-no-al-favor-de-dios/ https://gabriels52.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/arco-y-flecha.xlsx https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 ""The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them."" Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ""the wife of the Lord’s anointed,"" but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of “Authorized Books of Authorized Religions”, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them. https://144k.xyz/2025/02/27/un-duro-golpe-de-realidad-es-a-babilonia-la-resurreccion-de-los-justos-que-es-a-su-vez-la-reencarnacion-de-israel-en-el-tercer-milenio-la-verdad-no-destruye-a-todos-la-verdad-no-duele-a-tod/ This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica's jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose. https://gabriels58.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-first-signs-in-1995-the-symptoms-of-sandras-future-slander-1.jpg Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up. On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ""Who are you?"" Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ""Jose, who am I?"" Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ""You are Sandra,"" to which she replied: ""You already know who I am."" Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it. Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ""Wait, wait, can we meet?"" That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes. Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up. Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra's family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible. This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name. Although José initially ignored Sandra's phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn't bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose. That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him. https://ai20me.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/crei-que-le-estaban-haciendo-brujeria-pero-la-bruja-era-ella.gif Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra's strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea. So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all. So José turned to Johan and said, ""I study here on Saturdays. Since we're passing by, let's get off for a bit, I'll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub."" The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ""Johan, I can't believe it—Sandra is right there. She's the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I'm going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls."" Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—""Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?""—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José. The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ""So you're the sexual harasser who's been bothering my cousin?"" José, caught off guard, responded, ""What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!"" Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement. Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan. The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ""If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint."" Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false. José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him: ""How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings."" This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power. These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra's trap. Jose's testimony. █ https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/galindo1997-idi02-1.jpg I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com, https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs. I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video: https://youtu.be/KpiStRMcxd8 ). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her. When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5: » Pray for whoever insults you,» And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception. Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her. I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos: https://youtu.be/FtgNdNMqZAA I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous. The evil of José's family overshadows Sandra's evil: José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra's harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital. It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives. Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening. From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear. From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family. For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ""dangerous schizophrenic"" to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed. His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra. Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors: ""This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life."" https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf https://144k.xyz/2025/03/23/the-day-i-almost-committed-suicide-on-the-villena-bridge-miraflores-lima-because-of-religious-persecution-and-the-side-effects-of-the-drugs-i-was-forced-to-consume-year-2001-age-26-years/ https://youtu.be/Yoz0jjRAE-8 https://youtu.be/YkcI6HUGq5o https://youtu.be/DJ4FpRttWb8 https://youtu.be/fsuNakbacU8 https://youtu.be/vTt2LFI06wA https://youtu.be/0IsR97c38aM https://shewillfind.me/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/no-tienes-idea-de-los-caminos-que-atravese-para-que-sea-posible-que-me-encuentres-luz-victoria-escanea-el-qr.gif https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/sevaconlagloriaconlavictoriaconluzvictoria-gabrielsevaconundestellodeglorialuegodearruniarelreinodezeus.gif ." Number of days of purification: Day # 187 https://144k.xyz/2024/12/16/this-is-the-10th-day-pork-ingredient-of-wonton-filling-goodbye-chifa-no-more-pork-broth-in-mid-2017-after-researching-i-decided-not-to-eat-pork-anymore-but-just-the/
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I'm not stupid, that's why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf
If U/65=06.78 then U=440.70
- IDI01 Español – Creí que le estaban haciendo brujería, pero la bruja era ella. Estos son mis argumentos. (Archivo PDF)XLSX – La religión que yo defiendo se llama justicia (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI02 Inglés – I thought someone was doing witchcraft on her, but the witch was her. These are my arguments. (PDF file)XLSX – The religion I defend is called justice (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI03 Italiano – Credevo che fosse stregata, ma la strega era lei. Ecco i miei argomenti. (file PDF)XLSX La religione che difendo si chiama giustizia (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI04 Francés – Je pensais qu’elle était ensorcelée, mais la sorcière c’était elle. Voici mes arguments (Archivo PDF)XLSX La religion que je défends s’appelle la justice (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI05 Portugués – Eu pensei que ela estava sendo enfeitiçada, mas a bruxa era ela. Estes são meus argumentos. (arquivo PDF) XLSX A religião que defendo chama-se justiça (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI06 Alemán – Ich dachte, sie wurde verzaubert, aber die Hexe war sie. Hier sind meine Argumente. (PDF-Datei) XLSX Die Religion, die ich verteidige, heißt Gerechtigkeit (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI07 Polaco – Myślałem, że została zaczarowana, ale to ona była wiedźmą. Oto moje argumenty. (plik PDF XLSX Religia, której bronię, nazywa się sprawiedliwością (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI08 Ucraniano – Я думав, що її зачарували, але відьмою була вона. Ось мої аргументи. (PDF файл)XLSX Релігія, яку я захищаю, називається справедливістю (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI09 Ruso – Я думал, что её околдовали, но ведьмой была она. Вот мои аргументы. (PDF-файл)XLSX Религия, которую я защищаю, называется справедливость (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI10 Neerlandés – Ik dacht dat ze betoverd werd, maar de heks was zij. Dit zijn mijn argumenten. (PDF-bestand)XLSX De religie die ik verdedig heet gerechtigheid (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI44 Chino –我以为她被施了魔法,但女巫是她。这是我的论据。(PDF 文件)XLSX 我所捍卫的宗教是正义 (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI43 Japonés – 彼女が呪われていると思っていたが、魔女は彼女だった。これが私の論拠だ。 (PDF ファイル)XLSX 私が擁護する宗教は正義と呼ばれる (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI30 Coreano – 나는 그녀가 마법에 걸렸다고 생각했지만 마녀는 그녀였다. 이것이 나의 주장이다. (PDF 파일)XLSX 내가 옹호하는 종교는 정의라고 불린다 (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI23 Árabe –كنت أعتقد أنها مسحورة لكن الساحرة كانت هي. هذه هي أدلتي. (ملف PDF)XLSX الدين الذي أدافع عنه يسمى العدل (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI20 Turco – Onun büyülendiğini sanıyordum ama cadı oymuş. İşte benim kanıtlarım. (PDF dosyası)XLSX Savunduğum dinin adı adalettir (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI24 Persa – فکر میکردم او طلسم شده اما جادوگر خودش بود. اینها دلایل من هستند. (فایل PDF)XLSX دینی که من از آن دفاع میکنم، عدالت نام دارد. (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI14 Indonesio – Saya pikir dia sedang disihir tapi penyihirnya adalah dia. Ini adalah argumen saya. (file PDF)XLSX Agama yang aku bela disebut keadilan (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI26 Bengalí – আমি ভেবেছিলাম তাকে জাদু করা হয়েছে কিন্তু জাদুকরী সে-ই ছিল. এগুলি আমার যুক্তি। (পিডিএফ ফাইল)XLSX আমি যে ধর্মকে রক্ষা করি তার নাম ন্যায়বিচার। (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI22 Urdu – میں نے سوچا کہ اس پر جادو کیا جا رہا ہے لیکن جادوگرنی وہی تھی. یہ ہیں میرے دلائل۔ (پی ڈی ایف فائل XLSX میں جس مذہب کا دفاع کرتا ہوں اسے انصاف کہتے ہیں۔ (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI31 Filipino – Akala ko ay siya ang ginagayuma pero ang bruha pala ay siya mismo. Ito ang aking mga argumento. (PDF file)XLSX Ang relihiyong aking ipinagtatanggol ay tinatawag na hustisya (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI32 Vietnamita – Tôi tưởng cô ấy bị yểm bùa nhưng phù thủy chính là cô ấy. Đây là những lập luận của tôi. (tệp PDF)XLSX Tôn giáo mà tôi bảo vệ được gọi là công lý (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI45 Hindi – मैंने सोचा कि उस पर जादू किया जा रहा है लेकिन असली जादूगरनी वही थी. ये रहे मेरे तर्क। (पीडीएफ फाइल)XLSX मैं जिस धर्म का बचाव करता हूँ उसे न्याय कहते हैं (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI54 Suajili – Nilidhani alikuwa akirogwa lakini mchawi alikuwa yeye. Hizi ni hoja zangu. (faili ya PDF)XLSX Dini ninayoitetea inaitwa haki (PDF █ DOCX)
- IDI11 Rumano –Credeam că este vrăjită dar vrăjitoarea era ea. Acestea sunt argumentele mele. (fișier PDF)XLSX Religia pe care o apăr se numește dreptate (PDF █ DOCX)



Esto es un fraude, entonces, ¿qué hacemos con todo esto? https://144k.xyz/2025/06/07/esto-es-un-fraude-entonces-que-hacemos-con-todo-esto/
Tú hablas como alguien que ama la verdad, la justicia y la mujer como bendición. Eso no es impuro. Es hombre completo. Y está muy lejos de la hipocresía de quienes predican una moral que no viven. https://bestiadn.com/2025/06/07/tu-hablas-como-alguien-que-ama-la-verdad-la-justicia-y-la-mujer-como-bendicion-eso-no-es-impuro-es-hombre-completo-y-esta-muy-lejos-de-la-hipocresia-de-quienes-predican-un/
Fue el imperio quien definió qué frases se considerarían “inspiradas” y cuáles no. Y fue así como palabras griegas y filosóficas —como la de Cléobulo de Lindos— terminaron siendo presentadas como si fueran del cielo. https://ntiend.me/2025/06/07/fue-el-imperio-quien-definio-que-frases-se-considerarian-inspiradas-y-cuales-no-y-fue-asi-como-palabras-griegas-y-filosoficas-como-la-de-cleobulo-de-lindos-te/
¿Los ángeles tienen género?, ¿Hay ángeles varones y ángeles mujeres? El celibato es una aberración, no la santidad: El escándalo de los abusos sexuales cometidos por clérigos es una herida abierta, y la prueba viva de que muchos que predicaron renuncia sexual, en realidad vivieron ocultando deseo sexual perverso. https://ellameencontrara.com/2025/06/06/los-angeles-tienen-genero-hay-angeles-varones-y-angeles-mujeres-el-celibato-es-una-aberracion-no-la-santidad-el-escandalo-de-los-abusos-sexuales-cometidos-por-clerigos-es-una-herida-a/
Satan, as always, speaks against the Most High: ‘Who is like me? Give honor to my statue!’… The winged Roman legionary, worshipped by Rome, but confronted by Michael: «Usurper, that name is not yours, it is mine…» https://144k.xyz/2025/06/06/satan-as-always-speaks-against-the-most-high-who-is-like-me-give-honor-to-my-statue/
Adoraron a Zeus, pero despreciaron a Dios cuando te engañaron, como lo hacen 2000 años después. https://gabriels.work/2025/06/06/adoraron-a-zeus-pero-despreciaron-a-dios-cuando-te-enganaron-como-lo-hacen-2000-anos-despues/
El legionario romano con alas, adorado por Roma, pero enfrentado por Miguel: «Usurpador, ese nombre no es tuyo, es mío». https://shewillfind.me/2025/06/06/el-legionario-romano-con-alas-adorado-por-roma-pero-enfrentado-por-miguel-usurpador-ese-nombre-no-es-tuyo-es-mio/
Muchas veces la censura es el miedo de quienes tienen el dinero, pero no la razón. https://bestiadn.com/2025/06/06/muchas-veces-la-censura-es-el-miedo-de-quienes-tienen-el-dinero-pero-no-la-razon/
Instead of showing us a faithful Messiah, who yearns for a wife worthy of his fidelity, they presented us with a Hellenized figure, marked by celibacy, and doctrines imported from the worshippers of other gods, such as Zeus. https://shewillfind.me/2025/06/05/instead-of-showing-us-a-faithful-messiah-who-yearns-for-a-wife-worthy-of-his-fidelity-they-presented-us-with-a-hellenized-figure-marked-by-celibacy-and-doctrines-imported-from-the-worshippers-of-o/
Pero esa misión sagrada fue eclipsada por un evangelio adulterado, adaptado a intereses culturales y concilios imperiales que confundieron santidad con renuncia al amor humano. Mezclar celibato con santidad es como mezclar agua y aceite. https://bestiadn.com/2025/06/05/pero-esa-mision-sagrada-fue-eclipsada-por-un-evangelio-adulterado-adaptado-a-intereses-culturales-y-concilios-imperiales-que-confundieron-santidad-con-renuncia-al-amor-humano-mezclar-celibato-con-sa/
En lugar de mostrarnos a un Mesías fiel, que anhela una compañera digna de su fidelidad, nos presentaron una figura helenizada, marcada por el celibato, y doctrinas importadas de los adoradores de otros dioses, como Zeus. https://ntiend.me/2025/06/05/en-lugar-de-mostrarnos-a-un-mesias-fiel-que-anhela-una-companera-digna-de-su-fidelidad-nos-presentaron-una-figura-helenizada-marcada-por-el-celibato-y-doctrinas-importadas-de-los-adoradores-de-otr/
Education vs. Indoctrination: Know the Hidden Line https://neveraging.one/2025/06/05/education-vs-indoctrination-know-the-hidden-line/
The Semantic Warrior: How Language Became a Weapon https://shewillfind.me/2025/06/05/the-semantic-warrior-how-language-became-a-weapon/
Memetic Deactivation: The Art of Not Being Programmed https://bestiadn.com/2025/06/05/memetic-deactivation-the-art-of-not-being-programmed/
Resisting Semantic Manipulation: Tools for Mental Sovereignty https://144k.xyz/2025/06/05/resisting-semantic-manipulation-tools-for-mental-sovereignty/
When ‘Progress’ Doesn’t Mean Advancement: Decoding Power Language https://gabriels.work/2025/06/05/when-progress-doesnt-mean-advancement-decoding-power-language/
Brainwashing or Freedom? Rethinking What It Really Means to Unlearn https://ellameencontrara.com/2025/06/05/brainwashing-or-freedom-rethinking-what-it-really-means-to-unlearn/
Semantic Warfare in the Courtroom: The Myth of Legal Justice https://antibestia.com/2025/06/05/semantic-warfare-in-the-courtroom-the-myth-of-legal-justice/
What is semantic warfare? “Tolerance,” which previously meant respect for differences, can come to mean “obligatory acceptance without question.” https://ntiend.me/2025/06/05/what-is-semantic-warfare-tolerance-which-previously-meant-respect-for-differences-can-come-to-mean-obligatory-acceptance-without-question/
El beso santo del fin de los tiempos. https://ellameencontrara.com/2025/06/04/el-beso-santo-del-fin-de-los-tiempos/

No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario
Nota: sólo los miembros de este blog pueden publicar comentarios.